🔗 Share this article Activist Collective Claims to Have Extracted Countless of Audio Files from Spotify An activist organization has stated to have scraped a vast number of tracks from the popular streaming service and is getting ready to release them publicly. Possible Boost for Artificial Intelligence Development Observers noted the apparent data breach could aid artificial intelligence firms searching for material to train their models. An entity called Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million entries of metadata such as artist and album names. Spotify, which hosts more than 100 million tracks, confirmed that the leak did not constitute its full catalog. “We have located and disabled the nefarious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” stated a Spotify spokesperson. The Swedish service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorised access found a third party scraped public metadata and used illicit tactics to bypass DRM [digital rights management]. Group's Stated Goal and Concerns The streaming service does not believe the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for providing links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music. They asserted the audio files represented 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a means of exchanging large data files online. “Naturally Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a great beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and heritage”. Model Development and Intellectual Property Battleground Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ copyright, said the leaked music would probably be utilized for training AI models. “Training on illegally sourced data is unfortunately common in the tech sector, so this accessed music is almost certain to end up training AI models,” he said. The Anna’s Archive site makes references to a large online archive, a vast online repository of copyrighted books that has reportedly been leveraged by Meta to train its systems. The co-founder of an AI startup posted on the professional network that individuals of the public could in theory “create their own personal free version of the service”. The executive added it could also enable technology firms to “educate models on contemporary music at scale”. Intellectual property law has become a battleground between artists, authors and creatives on one side and AI companies on the other. Policy Proposals and Reactions Across Britain, creative professionals have raised concerns against a ministerial suggestion to allow AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without permission unless the owner signals. Almost every participant to a government call for evidence on the proposal has backed artists’ concerns. A government minister for science, research and technology told parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The administration has pledged to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by March 2025.